ConfigServer Community Forum

Mailscanner and calmav are doing a decent job of blocking a recent wave of virus.
But is it possible to have the IP blacklisted in CSF once a vrus has been detected.
This might slow down sebsequent receipts for a short while.

I did see that i may have been possible many years ago, but don't see this feature today.

Reinstalled MSFE after server reload
However MSFE is showing blank screen
CPanel 102.0.12

Anything that needs to be adjusted?

When doing Learn as Spam & Report to learn and report multiple messages, I occasionally get this error on a few of the messages:
SpamCop report to vmx.spamcop.net failed: Net::SMTP error

How can I best debug this and investigate it further? Perhaps there is a more verbose logging option for the spamcop reporting portion that I can use?

I am migrating from my old WHM server to a newly built one. I have MailScanner and MSFE installed, and am now looking for a way to migrate the configuration files for MSFE to my new server. I've already moved the license, so I'm unable to access the MSFE user interface in WHM on my old server. Is it possible to get these settings moved over from the old server via configuration files?

i got changed this file /usr/mailscanner/etc/rules/virus.scanning.rules. sometime, it will revert to previous value. any idea to fix this issue?
i need to prevent incoming/outgoing virus scanning for some sender address. Can directly do in virus.scanning.rules?

Hi.
On the Front-End Settings under Server Spam Whitelist, that I use a lot, I see that if I add a domain to the Server Spam Whitelist like this:
*@*.domaing.tld

it only allows the following:
anyword@word1.fixeddomain.tld

it doesn't allow any of the following:
anyword@fixeddomain.tld
anyword@word1.word2.fixeddomain.tld
anyword@word1.word2.word3.fixeddomain.tld

and in order to allow any of the...

Had suggested this some years back.

Would be super handy if the Email ID form field was replicated at the very top of the front-end, perhaps in the Mailscanner Service section.

The Lookup button could be optional, simply having the form submitted when clicking in the box after typing (or pasting in) the ID.

Don't know about other folks, but I primarily use search to look up by ID, based on...

Is there any update for version: ?

Thanks in advance

Hello
maybe a source of confusion.
In Mailcontrol / Search form the Search from Address does not search in the From: header as maybe spontaneous interpreted,
but does search in the Received: header
This is logic with

where is explained that
(..) the address added by the mail server when the email is received during the SMTP protocol exchange. It never uses the From: header field in an email...

I have an entry in MSFE Blacklist for a domain (*.domain.tld). But I am still getting email from that domain. Any ideas?

Hi,

Yesterday, I ran updates to a functioning installation. Afterwards, the service was stuck stopped. Manually stopping/starting didn't get it running again. Tried a server reboot as well, but no difference, so ran a forced update, and this got it running again.

Today I tried to access MSFE, but I get the following error (this has worked for years before...).

MySQL Error:

What should I...

Hello
The spamassassin / mailscanner and configserver mailscanner FE do need some serious processor power.
Has someone find a config / work about, to have the mailaccounts etc continued to be managed by the CPANEL server,
but have the mail send (via secure connection) to a separate server to have there the spamassasin / mailscanner and mailscanner FE work done
before being sending back to the...

HI,

I don't want to use the bayesian filter at all, is causing me ton's of problems.

I've read: but /etc/mail/spamassassin/configserver.cf isn't there.

So I have edited /usr/mailscanner/etc/spamassassin.conf setting use_bayes 0 is this everithing I need to do?

Thank you.

Hi,

My ConfigServer MailScanner Front-End tags ({spam}, {disarmed}, etc) tons of internal emails; by internal I mean domains that are hosted in the same server and sometimes also from the same domain! (from me@domain.com to other@domain.com being domain.com hosted in my own server).

I've whitelisted my ip's buts still doesnt work. Is there any solution available?

Thanks in advance!

Where do the spam.whitelist.rules get built from, and how can I make my changes permanent? I've checked every domain/whm user's cpanel mailscanner whitelist settings, so I know the rules are not coming from the user whitelists.

I thought it might be the cron job rebuilding the spam.whitelist.rules file, but I commented it out, and my changes stayed in place until I went to the front end,...

About a year ago, I had an issue where file attachments were being received as winmail.dat files.
Restarting Mailscanner resolved the issue.

Fast forward to last week, and the problem re-occured, so I restarted mailscanner, which again seemed to fix the issue.
However, it's happening again today.

Any ideas what might cause this please ?

@sarah : Short version here
/etc/exim_outgoing.conf empty after update
Restoring content from backup and restarting services
makes the red-banner go green and say MailScanner Status: Running
---
Hello,
did suggested update in MSFE to :
ConfigServer MailScanner Script - v5.04
MailScanner Front-End - v9.12
MailScanner - v5.3.3
Now MSFE says in red banner MailScanner Status: Disabled!
But it...

Hi,

I'm being spammed senseless by .buzz and .co domains. I can easily block .buzz but how can I block .co without affecting .com ?

Help Please

Hi.
Could it be possible to do a little change on the Digest Email?

I like this option as I can see in a glance all the emails that has been blocked by MailScanner, but it will be really great to have the IP of the sender instead of the Message ID.

Reason?
Well, if the Digest shows that the spams received are coming from the same IP or the same range, it will be easier for us to block the...

Hello,

For some reason i’m getting the digest email twice each time it runs (to the same email address0. Where can i check to see how/why this happens and correct it.

Thanks in advance.