"-w" option is for using in iptables commands. This should be modified inside csf scripts.
Anyway as a temporaly fix, I found that if we disable some of the blocklists and CC_DENY countries the issue does not happen. It seems that csf does not work well with large iptables list.
Search found 16 matches
- 05 Jul 2017, 12:09
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: Failed to start CSF and lfd
- Replies: 12
- Views: 18586
- 30 Jun 2017, 08:18
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: Failed to start CSF and lfd
- Replies: 12
- Views: 18586
Re: Failed to start CSF and lfd
How did you use "-w"? DId you modified "/usr/sbin/csf" script?pixelpadre wrote: ↑23 Jun 2017, 21:53 -w does not make a difference. I need to find a reliable alternative to this headache.
- 23 Jun 2017, 09:09
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: Failed to start CSF and lfd
- Replies: 12
- Views: 18586
Re: Failed to start CSF and lfd
Same issue here. # cat /etc/csf/csf.error Error: Error processing command for line [3186] (6 times): [Another app is currently holding the xtables lock. Perhaps you want to use the -w option?], at line 3186 in /usr/sbin/csf I think that /usr/sbin/csf should use "-w" to avoid this problem: ...
- 04 May 2017, 12:26
- Forum: General Discussion (cmc)
- Topic: Issue with whitelisting Mod_security rule in cPanel
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10142
Re: Issue with whitelisting Mod_security rule in cPanel
Same problem here. I whitelisted rules for several users and they are applied anyway.
- 15 Feb 2017, 09:00
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: csf / lfd stops working on some CL7 (systemd) systems
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4132
- 13 Feb 2017, 11:27
- Forum: General Discussion (csf)
- Topic: lfd.service: main process exited
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9953